MVarietyNews.com

Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 12:35:15 AM

Headlines:
MVarietyNews.com CNMI News Local Kaipat: No-maids provision anti-women

Kaipat: No-maids provision anti-women

E-mail Print

THE no-maids provisions of the recently announced federal regulations discriminate against women on several grounds, former Rep. Jacinta M. Kaipat said yesterday.

“First, it has the effect of forcing our women to stay home and take care of the household instead of working.”  Kaipat is the deputy secretary of labor who is on leave running for the Senate.
It is unacceptable to many people to hire a maid from an impersonal company, Kaipat said. 
“Women do not want to entrust their homes and their children to some employee of a company.  They want the household help that they have had for years and the people that they trust.   The drafters of this federal statute were all men,” she added.
“They apparently did not care about the rights of women to be in the workplace, and they did not understand the important part that women play in our workforce here in the commonwealth.” 
According to Kaipat, “The no-maids policy also discriminates against some of our longest-staying foreign workers. Women who have been on our islands taking care of our children and our elderly since the 1980’s do not deserve this back-of-the-hand treatment.   The foreign workers who help our children and elderly are valued employees.  They have long-standing relationships with our families and with our commonwealth.  They have done nothing to deserve this harsh result.” 
No similar limitation was put on occupations typically occupied by men, Kaipat pointed out.
If necessary, she added, the Commonwealth Legislature may be asked to allow households to be non-profit sole proprietorships in order to continue to hire their long-time houseworkers directly and not through a manpower service. 
“We spent some considerable effort in this administration cleaning up the labor situation with manpower services,” Kaipat said.  “It is much better for our foreign workers to deal directly with the families for whom they work and not be subject to manpower services which add cost without adding any benefit to the community or to the workers.”

 

Comments 

 
-4 #22 strikezone 2009-11-03 09:17 Better be legally a maid than a stray prostitute. Garment workers (most whom are women) who cant find jobs even as a maid become what…?
 
 
-4 #21 sembe 2009-11-03 08:34 That\'s right, Cinta! First maids, next club dancers. Think about it women of the CNMI, next thing you know, our husbands will be forcing us to stay home to entertain them! THESE WOMEN ARE THE STITCHES THAT KEEP THE FABRIC OF OUR FAMILY TOGETHER!
 
 
+6 #20 TheTruthHurts 2009-11-03 06:25 Newswatcher (GB),

Maybe Cinta can perhaps hire a maid to write for her. I am pretty confident Mr. Hunter wouldn\'t. Greg may though he will need a job in about a month.
 
 
+15 #19 digadigabugabuga 2009-11-03 06:16 Ai Adai, this hurts to hear something like this from you Cinta. This loses my vote for sure. I\'ll pick quality of life for all people any day.
 
 
-14 #18 Newswatcher 2009-11-03 06:14 I heard that Glen Hunter jumped ship and is now ghost writing for Cinta Kaipat instead of Tina Sablan.
 
 
+13 #17 TheTruthHurts 2009-11-03 05:45 Man this article really refreshes my memory of the time that Deanne Seimer ghost wrote that letter for Cinta and accidentally sent it to Rep Sablan.

Wow. Some things never change.

Who ghost wrote this for her?
 
 
-6 #16 TheTruthHurts 2009-11-03 05:35 History Lesson:

Back in the 1800s Carolinian and Chamorru peoples (our ancestors) used to sail our boats to bring in low cost foreign workers from the PI and China and other Asian areas. We needed these low cost workers to watch our children while both the men and the WOMEN went out into the fields and seas to earn our living.

C\'mon people! We must do what we can to KEEP our culture! Fight the Federalies! Join Cinta! Join Ben! Join Deanne!

Hell no our maids won\'t go! Hell no our maids wont go!
 
 
+21 #15 dailyreader 2009-11-03 04:00 If they are so valued, pay them more than minimum wage and treat them better.
 
 
-19 #14 crush 2009-11-03 02:50 Teacher then why can the U.S Immigration stop such practices that are still happening in the states. . As i said before Teacher, there\'s a lot small retailers out here in California still preaching the same ole thing. STILL paying low wages to illegal immigrants, treating them like slaves and not even paying them overtime. Teacher, I bet that if such regs are applied in some of the states here..Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and some of the Women organization out there will be all over DOHS.
 
 
+22 #13 captain 2009-11-03 02:31 Well looks like Kaipat and others do not like the idea that they have to start paying for the luxury of a house worker and set hours. They can no longer pay these workers the minimum wage (with no overtime) and then deduct the increase back out for food, lodging, power and water etc. to keep them with less than they started with before the minimum wage affected these workers. Having these house workers work from and agency is standard across the US and many parts of the world. It insures that the workers are paid and also they are bonded in case of theft or other occurrences. So now you want \"maids\" One of the spouse can work so that you can pay the maid then you can live on the other spouses income. You may have to teach your kids to get a part time job and help around the house also now. What a \"bumer\". It seems though that Kaipat has not changed, every time she opens her mouth she still put her foot in it.
 

You must be a registered member to post comments.